🔴 CVE-2008-4250

CVE-2008-4250 is a critical buffer overflow in Windows Server service that allows remote code execution via crafted RPC requests. This vulnerability was actively exploited by the Conficker worm and affects network-accessible Windows systems including servers commonly exposed to the internet.

← Back to Overview
HIGH_RISK
Risk Level
9.8
CVSS Score
NETWORK
Attack Vector
Initial Access
ATT&CK Tactic
T1190 — Exploit Public-Facing Application
ATT&CK Technique
VERY_HIGH
Deployment Risk
No
Ransomware

📋 Vulnerability Details

Data Source: CIRCL

Confidence: HIGH

Exploitation Method: DIRECT_NETWORK

CVE Published: 2008-10-23

Added to CISA KEV: 2026-05-20 6418 DAYS BETWEEN CVE AND KEV

🎯 Recommendations:

🔍 Web Intelligence (Kagi · 2026-06-03)

CVE-2008-4250 is a critical vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows Server service, famously known as the "Server Service vulnerability" or the flaw behind the Conficker (also known as Downadup) worm [1]?t=1&cve_id=CVE-2008-4250?kagi_q=CVE-2008-4250+details+exploitation+threat+actors+impact+mitigation.

Overview and Impact
  • Impact: Successful exploitation allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target system with SYSTEM-level privileges [1] [4]. This gives the attacker full control over the affected machine, including the ability to install programs, view/change/delete data, or create new accounts with full user rights.
  • Affected Versions: The vulnerability affected a wide range of older Windows operating systems, including Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP (SP2 and SP3), Windows Server 2003 (SP1 and SP2), Windows Vista (Gold and SP1), Windows Server 2008, and Windows 7 Pre-Beta [1].
Exploitation Details
  • Attack Method: The vulnerability is triggered by sending a specially crafted RPC request to the Server service, which causes a buffer overflow during path canonicalization [1].
  • Requirements: It is a network-based attack that does not require any user interaction or authorization privileges [4]. Because it is highly automatable, it was exceptionally dangerous for worm-like propagation.
  • Active Exploitation: The vulnerability was actively exploited in the wild shortly after its disclosure in October 2008, most notably by the Gimmiv.A malware and subsequently the massive Conficker worm [1]?t=1&cve_id=CVE-2008-4250?kagi_q=CVE-2008-4250+details+exploitation+threat+actors+impact+mitigation. It remains listed in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog due to its historical significance and the potential for legacy systems to remain unpatched [3].
Mitigation and Patch Status
  • Patch Status: Microsoft addressed this vulnerability in Security Bulletin MS08-067, released in October 2008 [2].
  • Mitigation: The primary mitigation is applying the security update provided by Microsoft. Additionally, firewall best practices—specifically blocking unsolicited inbound traffic to the Server service (typically over ports 139 and 445)—can help protect network resources from external attacks [2].

Sources

  1. NVD - CVE-2008-4250

    An official website of the United States government Here's how you know ... CVE-2008-4250 Detail. Description. The Server service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, Server 2008, and 7 Pre-Beta allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code…

  2. Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-067 - Critical

    Mitigating Factors for Server Service Vulnerability - CVE-2008-4250. Mitigation refers to a setting, common configuration, or general best- ... Mitigating Factors for Server Service Vulnerability - CVE-2008-4250 Mitigation refers to a setting, common configuration, or general best-practice, existing…

  3. Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

    CISA maintains the authoritative source of vulnerabilities that have been exploited in the wild. Organizations should use the KEV catalog as an input to their ...

  4. CVE-2008-4250 vulnerability in Microsoft Products

    CVE-2008-4250 is exploitable with network access, and does not require authorization privileges or user interaction. This vulnerability is considered to have a low attack complexity. This vulnerability is known to be actively exploited by threat actors in an automatable fashion. The potential impact…